Find preventable problems before submission
Pre-Submission Review evaluates whether the manuscript and supporting documents are complete, coherent, and aligned with the target journal’s visible requirements. The reviewer flags missing information, inconsistent presentation, reporting gaps, weak sections, and administrative issues so the author can prioritise revisions before submission.
What this service includes
- Target-journal guideline and article-type review
- Manuscript completeness and section-alignment check
- Reporting, declaration, reference, figure, and table review
- Prioritised revision notes and submission checklist
Our four-step workflow
Review target journal guidance
We confirm the journal, article type, author instructions, required declarations, and file requirements.
Assess manuscript completeness
The reviewer checks structure, abstract, methods, results, discussion, references, tables, figures, and supplementary material.
Flag priority revisions
Issues are ranked by importance so the author can address critical submission barriers first.
Provide a submission checklist
You receive a practical checklist covering manuscript changes, supporting documents, and final author actions.
What you receive
A detailed readiness report, a prioritised action list, and a target-journal submission checklist. Editing or formatting can be added separately.
Discuss your manuscript
Send the manuscript, target-journal link, article type, current supporting files, and planned submission date.